Publicación: Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison of International Perioperative Care Protocols and Practices in 26 Countries
| dc.contributor.author | Bier-Laning, Carol M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cramer, John D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Roy, Soham | |
| dc.contributor.author | Palmieri, Patrick A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amin, Ayman Abdel Wahab | |
| dc.contributor.author | Añón, José Manuel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bonilla-Asalde, César Antonio | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bradley, P. J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chaturvedi, Pankaj P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cognetti, David M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-05T16:37:56Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a global surge in critically ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, some of whom may benefit from tracheostomy. Decisions on if, when, and how to perform tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 have major implications for patients, clinicians, and hospitals. We investigated the tracheostomy protocols and practices that institutions around the world have put into place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Data Sources: Protocols for tracheostomy in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection from individual institutions (n = 59) were obtained from the United States and 25 other countries, including data from several low- and middle-income countries, 23 published or society-endorsed protocols, and 36 institutional protocols. Review Methods: The comparative document analysis involved cross-sectional review of institutional protocols and practices. Data sources were analyzed for timing of tracheostomy, contraindications, preoperative testing, personal protective equipment (PPE), surgical technique, and postoperative management. Conclusions: Timing of tracheostomy varied from 3 to >21 days, with over 90% of protocols recommending 14 days of intubation prior to tracheostomy. Most protocols advocate delaying tracheostomy until COVID-19 testing was negative. All protocols involved use of N95 or higher PPE. Both open and percutaneous techniques were reported. Timing of tracheostomy changes ranged from 5 to >30 days postoperatively, sometimes contingent on negative COVID-19 test results. Implications for Practice: Wide variation exists in tracheostomy protocols, reflecting geographical variation, different resource constraints, and limited data to drive evidence-based care standards. Findings presented herein may provide reference points and a framework for evolving care standards. © 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0194599820961985 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85094954908 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://cris.uwiener.edu.pe/handle/001/980 | |
| dc.identifier.uuid | f284e101-055c-4be4-a329-740ec3861284 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | SAGE Publications Inc. | |
| dc.relation.citationissue | 6 | |
| dc.relation.citationvolume | 164 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery | |
| dc.relation.issn | 10976817 | |
| dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.title | Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison of International Perioperative Care Protocols and Practices in 26 Countries | |
| dc.type | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 1147 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 1136 |
